Friday, July 19, 2019

AHA Mega (and not so Mega) Code Meds

My brother was visiting the other day and found me studying in the morning.  He sat down across the table from me and asked, bemusedly, "Are you ever going to be done with school?"

Nah.  Nope.  Wrong career for that.  I decided to go into medicine, which means being in school for all perpetuity.  Also, do you not know me?  I'm the kid that just wants to know why.

In this case, I was studying for the AHA ACLS exam based off their 2015 Handbook of ER Cardiovascular Care.  This will be a series of posts where I vomit up everything I can remember from my crash course.

The main challenges:

1) A medications mixed up: atropine, adenosine, amiodarone.  I'll try to create little reminders for you, but I haven't really figured out a way to remember these except for repetition (literally, I took PALS, then TNCC, and now ACLS all within 6 months, so, seriously, repetition is all I've got).

2) How to remember which medications go with which EKG/scenario.  The flowcharts are very confusing.  It'll be easier to understand when I (re)break down EKGs in a different post that I'll link here later.  This is my cheat sheet just for medications.

3) When to use expert consult, when to use meds, when to use electricity?


Tachycardia with atrial involvement

Here are the main medications you need for tachycardia with a pulse and nonsymptomat (stable-nonsymptomatic): examples of this are a-fib or a-flutter <150bpm ventricular response.

Expert consultation and most likely Ca2+ blockers, B-Blockers, and anticoagulants.

Oftentimes this situation can deteriorate into tachy with a pulse and symptoms...

Here are the main medications you need for tachycardia with a pulse and symptoms (stable-symptomatic):

First give Adenosine 6 mg, then 12 mg if v-tach is refractory (refractory means it refuses to slow down).  Adenosine must be pushed fast, as in you don't have time to mess around with unscrewing a flush, etc.  Adenosine has to be given fast enough to cause a brief asystole.  You need to choose an IV site close to the heart, and use a stopcock mechanism.  Memory trick: I remember to use Adenosine to stop the heart because I must stop before I go into a lion's den.


(So, adenosine is given for symptomatic tachycardia involving the atria.)

Refractory after 12 mg adenosine?  Cardiovert.
Cardioversion joules:
Narrow and regular QRS (=SVT)? start at 50J, then work your way up to 100J.
Narrow irregular QRS (a-fib w/ RVR)? start with 120, then work your way up to 200J
If your QRS is wide and Irregular, you are in V-fib--immediately DFIB 120J and follow your algorithm for cardiac arrest with a shockable rhythm. Give epi 1 mg q 3-5 minutes alternating with 2 doses of amiodarone while continuing CPR and rescue breaths (300mg bolus first dose, then 150mg second dose--note: if you already started using amiodarone to slow down ventricular tachycardia, you will have to trade out these doses of amiodarone because of reasons and other reasons -- all of which I find unsatisfactory for my curiosity, but I don't have a better answer at this time).

I made the distinction of tachy with a pulse (sbp>=90mmhg) w/ or w/o symptoms b/c the test will make that distinction.  Stable, w/o symptoms=expert consultation.  Stable, w/ symptoms=medications.  Unstable= sedation, pain medication, cardioversion.


Tachycardia originating from the ventricles w/ a pulse and SBP>90 (stable)

If the QRS complexes are wide and you don't see p-waves, it's v-tachy originating from the ventricles.  The patient is, as my instructor jokingly said, "only half dead," so you only give 1/2 the amiodarone you would normally give for a totally dead (v-fib, pulseless v-tach) patient.  That is to say, give 150 mg amiodarone over 10 minutes by IV drip, and then synchronize cardiovert if the v-tach is refractory.

(So, amiodarone is used for tachycardias originating from/associated with ventricles.)


Here are the main medications you need for brady with a pulse:

Atropine: 0.5 mg q 3-5 min for a max total dose of 3mg (=6 doses)
Epi 2-10mcg/min infusion
Dopamine 2-20mcg/kg/min infusion

(I specifically placed epi and dopamine in this order b/c it helps me remember: 2-10 mcg/min first, then 2-20 mcg/kg/min, but in reality, you'd ask your doctor which medication they would like you to infuse.)

If refractory/severe bradycardia (like 3rd degree block), get consent if the patient is conscious, then give sedation and pain medication (fentanyl, morphine) and begin pacing @ 70ppm.  You may begin pacing before the patient is started on drips.

PEA/Asystole: Epi, epi, epi, epi, epi... with a lot of CPR, diagnose the underlying problem.

Saturday, June 11, 2016

Expletive-Expletive GREs

I got it into my head that I should get an MSN.  Unfortunately, my first BA grades were lackluster, so in order to prove myself worthy of not repeating a bachelor's program, I have to take the GREs.  Which I have done in the past.  About six years ago.

It was a train wreck.  Like, right into a solid cement wall.

So, I'm going to do what I do best.  Back that train up and ram it into the wall again.  I'm hoping to get through the wall around October.

I guess I'll be venting about math for a bit.  Hold onto your seats.

Wednesday, January 27, 2016

Store O2 Tanks Upright

So, hopefully I've made it to my NCLEX and I'm doing well (crossing fingers for 75 questions to pass), but while I'm in my own personal version of nursing test hell, here's a caveat for you.

"All cylinders present a physical hazard because the contents are under pressure of 2,000+ pounds per square inch. This high amount of potential energy inside the cylinder makes it a potential rocket or bomb. Bumping, tipping, or falling could damage the cylinder. If the valve were knocked off or if the cylinder ruptures in a fire, it can become a missile that can penetrate concrete walls.  This is why it is important to always keep a cylinder in an upright and secured position."


http://ehs.research.uiowa.edu/compressed-gas-cylinders

Sunday, January 24, 2016

ABG Tutorial




I promised I would get to an ABG Tutorial, so, I'm finally doing it.

What's the point of ABGs?

The human body functions in a narrow pH window of 7.35-7.45--but what does that mean?  When we think about the human body, or any living thing, really, we should be thinking about enzymes--little super efficient protein clumps that help to speed reactions that allow us to exist as large, billion celled complex creatures.  Those enzymes are very sensitive to environmental changes.  For example, if you heat or freeze them, like with a fever, or with hypothermia, they'll fall apart and stop working, and then the person dies.  The physiologic pH range necessary to prevent the enzymes in the human body from denaturing (coming unwound and falling apart into bits) and inactivating, is between 7.35 and 7.45.  If you party a little too hard and throw up for hours (losing acid from your stomach), or eat some bad shellfish while you're in Cancun and have 25 sessions of diarrhea in a day (losing a lot of base), or if you have COPD, so you can't breathe out the carbon dioxide (holding on to acid), or if your bother tackled you too hard playing football and you tore your ACL and you're hyperventilating because you're in pain (blowing off all the acid), you could shift toward an acidic blood level (<7.40) or basic blood level (7.40<).  Luckily, our bodies have safety mechanisms built into place to compensate for those kind of pH shifts.

Where did the acids and bases come from to begin with?

Acid is a natural byproduct of cellular respiration.  You can learn more about it with this Youtube Video by Eric Strong, MD., but let me just show you this equation:









Sugar = C6H12O6
Oxygen = O2
Carbon Dioxide = CO2
Water = H2O
Energy = ATP






Sugar (from food) + Oxygen (from lungs) go into the blood and into the cells
The cell metabolizes the sugar and oxygen and releases Carbon Dioxide + Water + ATP (which gets used by the cell).  The CO2 and H2O goes into the blood stream:

Carbon Dioxide + Water --> Carbonic Acid --> Protons + Bicarbonate

(If you are curious as how these components all fit together in cellular respiration, read this next post on cellular respiration, or watch this great Khan Academy video on Citric Acid and Krebs Cycle.  But it's not necessary to understand all of this to understand acid-base.)

In chemistry, we learned that protons are just a hydrogen stripped of an electron.  They look like this: H+.  We also learned that the definition of an acid is the ability for a substance to give up a proton.  You might remember, also, that bicarbonate (HCO3-) is a weak base because it only has the ability to pick up a single proton.  In the human body, once sugar and oxygen have broken down into H+ and HCO3-, they get pumped in the blood to the kidneys where the protons are urinated out, and the kidneys preserve the HCO3- as a "buffer" or a substance that prevents pH from shifting because it can easily pick up, carry, and later let go of H+'s.  This entire equation:
CO2+H2O<-->H2CO3<-->H+ + HCO3-
is the buffer that prevents our blood from swinging from acid to base (or vice versa) and killing us.











































There are two main hurdles to get over when thinking about Arterial Blood Gases (ABGs).  The first is, memorizing ranges.  If you're like most nursing students, you hate memorizing ranges.  You can memorize something like the back of your hand, walk away for a few months, and not even realize you forgot what you forgot.  We just went over it with our NCLEX review class and I found myself stuttering a little with the ranges, and then having to double check to see if I got the compensation correct, so, I need the practice, too, and I am not claiming to be perfect at these.

Here are the lab values you need to memorize.  Sorry, there's no getting around it.
PaO2 80-100 mm Hg
SaO2 95-100%
pH 7.35-7.45
PaCO2 35-45 mm Hg
HCO3- 22-28 mEq/L

Bicarbonate is chemically written as HCO3− but I'll write it as HCO3-, since it's easier to type.

The second hurdle regarding ABGs is incorporating metabolic or respiratory into the picture.  I'd like to disabuse you of the concept that metabolic means a kidney problem, and respiratory means a problem with the lungs.  Yes, on one hand, metabolic conditions are influenced by the bicarbonate concentration, which is largely conserved by the kidneys, however, the kidneys can be the origin of the bicarbonate imbalance, or it can be a compensatory mechanisms.  Similarly, if there is a change in CO2, it can be because there is something wrong with the lungs, or, it can be that the lungs are compensating for a problem somewhere else in the body.  As with all other conditions of the body, there is overlap, so I challenge you to approach ABG's with a bird's eye view.  I'll revisit this concept after we've nailed down a few basics.

pH 7.35-7.45, PaCO2 35-45 mm Hg, HCO3- 22-28 mEq/L tells you the acid base status of the patient--in other words, if the blood pH is normal, too acidemic, or too alkalemic.

PaCO2 35-45 mm Hg tells you the patient's ventilation status.  If this number is high, either your patient isn't breathing out the CO2 efficiently enough, or your body is creating a high concentration CO2 (from cellular respiration), or both.

PaO2 80-100 mm Hg, SaO2 95-100%, PaCO2 35-45 mm Hg together give you a picture of how well the patient is being oxygenated.


For this post, let's just focus on acid-base part of the ABGs: pH, PaCO2, and HCO3-.

I'm sure you've seen a pH scale like this in your general chemistry class:

https://sciencesummative.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/ph-scale.jpg


In your body, your blood should have a pH level between 7.35-7.45.  Technically, anything above 7 is alkaline, so, our bodies are actually a little on the alkaline side, but, look, a pH of 7 is pure water, and 8 is seawater.  Since our blood does have salt and other electrolytes in it, but it's definitely not as salty as seawater, it would make sense that it would fall somewhere between 7 and 8. 

Let's just zoom in on the section we need: 
http://image.slidesharecdn.com/07-140422135054-phpapp02/95/07-acid-base-disorders-8-638.jpg?cb=1398192734

Tip 1:
A caveat about the pH range of blood: just because the pH value is within that range, does not mean the blood isn't more acidotic or alkalotic.  Perfectly balanced blood is 7.40, but that is just one point on the scale.  In other words, if the pH is between 7.35 and 7.40, it is on the acidic side of normal, and if the pH is between 7.40 and 7.45, it is on the alkalotic side of normal.  This comes into play with compensation.

Tip 2:
When looking at the paCO2 values and the HCO3- values, consider what those numbers mean.  We know that the normal range for paCO2 is 35-45, so what does a paCO2 of 20 mean?  50?  We know that the normal range for HCO3- is 22-26, so what does a HCO3- of 16 mean?  What does a HCO3- of 30 mean?

Think about it in terms of water, cream and coffee.  For argument's sake, let's say that the water has the same pH as our blood in perfectly balanced conditions: 7.40.  Coffee is acidic.  Cream is alkaline.

If I had a big tub of water, and I dumped in 50 cups of coffee, would that new mixture now be more acidic than plain water?  Yes.  If I could magically remove 30 of those cups of coffee, would it be more or less acidic than when it had 50 cups of coffee?  It would be less acidic.

If I took a clean tub of water and dumped in 22 cups of cream.  Would that be more alkaline?  Yes. What if I added another 14 cups?  Would it be even more alkaline?  Yes.  What if I only had 10 cups of cream in a tub of water?  Would it be less alkaline than 30 cups?  22? cups?

Tip 3: Using the Tub of Water/ Coffee & Creamer Metaphor

Okay, so, remember, in our perfect world, the tub of water has exactly a 7.40, perfectly balanced pH.

Now, what if I had a clean tub of water and I dumped in 40 cups of coffee (remember, paCO2 is 35-45, so 40 is a nice number right in the middle).  That water is acidic.  You would expect the pH to drop under 7.35, yes?  Now, what if I add 24 cups of cream (remember HCO3- is 22-26, so 24 is a nice number right in the middle).  That base will neutralize that acid, so the pH would bounce back up to somewhere between 7.35-7.45.  Yes?  What if I accidentally add too much cream?  What if I add like 40 cups of cream?  That solution would be alkaline, yes?

So, yes, the substance in the patient's blood is an acid (paCO2) or a base (HCO3-) but always ask yourself, how does the paCO2 and the HCO3- relate to the blood pH?
Can a low CO2 (acid) level cause an acidic blood pH if the HCO3- is normal?  No.  That's not logical, you have too little acid and too much base.
Can a high CO2 level cause an acidic blood pH if the HCO3- is normal?  Yes.  It's like having a tiny bit of cream in a whole lot of coffee.  Your drink will be very acidic.
Can a low HCO3- level cause an alkaline blood pH if the CO2 is normal?  No, you have too much acid and too little base.
Can a high HCO3- level cause an alkaline blood pH if the CO2 is normal?  Yes.  It's like having 50 creamers in your coffee--you'd feel like you were drinking milk with a side of coffee.

Tip 4: Compensation
In order for the body to survive the body must either create more acid, or more base to bring the pH back into balance between 7.35-7.45.  This process is called compensation.  The body is only compensated if the pH is within normal range.

Tip 5: The body will initially compensate with the other system

Initial pathological problem: high HCO3- (too alkalotic/basic=too much cream)
Body compensates by: increase PaCO2 (by slowing down breathing to retain CO2=adding more coffee)

Initial pathological problem: low HCO3- (not alkalotic/basic enough=not enough creamer)
Body compensates by: decrease PaCO2 (by increasing respirations to blow off CO2=using a smaller volume of coffee)

Initial pathological problem: high paCO2 (too acidotic=too much coffee)
Body compensates by: increasing HCO3- (peeing out a lot of H+ and sparing a lot of HCO3-=adding a lot of cream)

Initial pathological problem: low paCO2 (not acidotic enough=too little coffee)
Body compensates by: releasing HCO3- (peeing out bicarbonate=only using a little cream)



The steps for determining uncompensated acid base:
1) Look at the pH.  Is it greater than 7.45 (alkaline) or less than 7.35 (acidic)?
2) Look at the paCO2.  Is it less acidic than normal <35?  Or is it more acidic than normal >45?
Can the pH be explained by this?
3) Look at the HCO3-.  Is it less basic than normal <22?  Or is it more basic than normal >26?
Can the pH be explained by this?

Examples:
pH 7.3 (<7.35=acidotic)
paCO2 50 (>45=high concentration of acid)
HCO3- 24 (right in the middle between 22 and 26=normal level of bicarbonate)
This is uncompensated respiratory acidosis.

pH 7.5 (>7.45=basic/alkalotic)
paCO2 20 (<35 = low concentration of acid)
HCO3- 24 (right in the middle between 22 and 26=normal level of bicarbonate)
This is uncompensated respiratory alkalosis.

pH 7.3 (<7.35=acidotic)
paCO2 37 (between 35-45= normal carbon dioxide level)
HCO3- 15 (less than 22-26)
This is uncompensated metabolic acidosis.

pH 7.5 (>7.45=alkalotic)
paCO2 37 (between 35-45 = normal carbon dioxide level)
HCO3-30 (greater than 22-26)
This is uncompensated metabolic alkalosis.

(Note: Uncompensated metabolic unbalances are rare, and usually happen because mechanical ventilation is also occurring.)

If yes, is it greater than or less than 7.40?  (Remember, even within normal range, it can still be on the acidotic or alkalotic side).

__________________________

Compensated or uncompensated refers to whether or not the pH is within normal range.  If the pH is within normal range, the body has compensated.  End of story.

If the pH is not within normal range, the body has not yet compensated.

The confusing part is whether something is totally uncompensated (meaning the body hasn't started to change respirations or HCO3- concentrations to correct the pH imbalance), or partially compensated.  In my mind, if the pH isn't within normal range, it is impossible to tell with only one set of ABGs whether something is beginning to compensate or not.  How can you tell a trend with just one data point?  But, GENERALLY speaking, your lungs start to react toward acid base imbalances faster than your kidneys (takes a few days), so if both your lungs and your kidneys are functioning, you'll se shifts in your paCO2 first. You're definitely uncompensated if the pH is imbalanced, AND both the kidneys (HCO3-) and the lungs (paCO2) have wacky numbers.  And, if on the next draw the parameter that doesn't match the pH is continuing to move in the opposite direction, the body is compensating, but has only succeeded in doing so partially.  For example, if your body is in metabolic acidosis, and on the first draw your PaCO2 is 35, and on the second it is 30, then your PaCO2 is becoming "less acidic," so you are breathing harder and faster to blow off more carbon dioxide (acid) to help make your body less acidic.  If anyone can give me an actual way of magically telling with one data point when all three values are out of whack whether or not that body is partially compensated or just totally uncompensated, I'm all ears.  Until then, I'm sticking with my story.

_________________________

Treatment of


  • respiratory acidosis is to improve ventilation to help the person blow off acid (CO2)=mechanical ventilation
  • respiratory alkalosis is to retain as much acid (CO2) as possible = paper bag, anxiolytics, pain medications, etc.
  • metabolic acidosis is to bind, excrete, or store the acid (H+) by treating the underlying cause (tx DKA, tx salicylate or ETOH poisoning, tx dehydration/diarrhea/starvation, tx renal failure, or give bicarbonate)
  • metabolic alkalosis is to excrete the bicarbonate: mechanical ventilation to prevent patient from dying of suffocation, and balance the electrolytes.  Wait until the kidneys have excreted the adequate bicarbonate.  If in renal failure, use dialysis.

The ATI reviews have this cute little chart they pass out that I won't replicate, because I don't want them to sue me, but essentially it goes like this:

resp acidosis--naloxone
resp alkalosis--re-breather
met acidosis--diphenoxylate/atropine (to make you stop having diarrhea), and humulin R (regular insulin), but then they didn't follow up with adjusting for potassium imbalances, etc.
metabolic alkalosis--ondansetron (to make you stop puking)

The reason why I'm not totally sold on that chart is because it makes a lot of assumptions about the etiologies of each of those scenarios.

References:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10421978
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/003883.htm
http://www.rmtcnet.com/resources/Recommended%20Best%20Practices%20for%20TCO2%20Testing%20and%20Sample%20Collection.pdf
http://www.anaesthesiamcq.com/AcidBaseBook/ab2_4.php
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicarbonate



Saturday, January 23, 2016

Day 3: Leadership and Management

I really hate the of subject of Leadership and Management, because (contrary to what the books say) leadership can't be taught to everyone--this is because emotional intelligence is not something that can replicated by book learning.  To be a great leader, you need to be able to understand other people's emotions, even when they're hiding their emotions, or unable to express them.  You have to anticipate people's needs, whether you are functioning as a transformational leader or a transactional one.  And you have to be able to hold your own emotions in check until you have all the facts--and that type of self control is not necessarily trainable in everyone.  Life isn't "the Karate Kid."

The books will have you think that leadership and management are separate entities.   In my experience leadership is empty without management, and management is tyrannical without leadership.  Some people can learn charisma, learn to hear what their people are saying, but to be able to do it in a way that is sustainable, and practical, and attainable, and admirable--that is entirely another matter.

There are 3 leadership styles:
Authoritative: which the books will have you believe works well with employees with little to no formal education (I think that that is insulting--as if a person with no education cannot have common sense and can't be taught, but I digress), and uses coercion.  The ATI books says that the work output by the staff is usually high, but then follows it with the caveat that this is "good for crisis situations and bureaucratic settings," but that's exactly why it's a shitty leadership style--and I've had bosses and captains use this as a primary style, and it's not sustainable.
Democratic: motivates group decisions by supporting staff achievements, like a carrot and stick, gold star to maintain cooperation and collaboration.
Laissez-faire: you rely on your individual members to be highly motivated and creative, and usually those members become an informal leader (or manager) to make things happen.

The way this is taught, you would believe that each leader is pigeon holed into one style.  That is not the case. You should be able to move fluidly between each when the need arises, but more importantly, I think what makes a great leader is the ability to recognize when each is needed based upon an accurate reading of your follower's emotions and needs.

In order to avoid being an empty "leader" suit, you have to have a formal position of authority and power--which is what a manager has--but, you also have to have the clinical expertise, a good working relationship with your team, and the ability to "coach your subordinate," which sounds an awful lot like leading--doesn't it?  I would add, that to be an effective manager (meaning, to not become a tyrant only driven by meeting quarterlies) you have to have a long term vision (which the textbooks put under leadership) for health and sustainability, while also knowing when to enforce a zero-tolerance environment.

As a manager you have to Plan a path toward a goal, Organize a power structure/chain of command, Staff your business with hard-working, willing, instinctive workers, Direct those staff, and "Control" your staff (which really means ensuring that everyone on your team is performing adequately to attain your goal--so, if someone is slacking or wandering off task, you have to bring them in line, and if they won't heel, then you got to get rid of them).

Good time management requires that you have the ability to prioritize:

Before an accident happens that will require medical treatment, first:
safety/risk reduction: look to eliminate risk (health screens, eating healthy, removing throw rugs, etc.
--------safety detour for random shit that comes up on the test----
double bagging is only necessary if the outside of the bag is contaminated
fire extinguishers: A for paper, B, for liquids eg, grease and gas, C for electrical
for fires: keep emergency numbers near phone, and phone near the bed.  No nylon, wool, synthetics with O2 supplementation.  Cotton only.  No flammable materials.
carbon monoxide with any carbon burning anything--lawn mowers, wood stoves, etc.
burns: 98-99F should be the formula and bath water temperature for neonates.  Home hot water heating should be 120F or less
booster for kids up to 40lbs, or until 4'9"
falls happen with skeletal/muscle changes, including pregnancy, aging, and kyphosis

Biohazard /Bioterrorism
Ok, here's the skinny:
airborne anthrax: flu-like symptoms, dyspnea/SOB, meningitis, muscle aches
TX ciprofloxacin+vanco+PCN

cutaneous anthrax: itchy lesions-->vesicular lesions-->necrosis-->eschar  fevers, chills
TX ciprofloxacin+doxycycline

botulism: descending paralysis, N/V, kills you when you stop breathing.
TX: airway, antitoxin, eliminate the toxin (dunno how--the ATI book doesn't say.  If I find out, I'll post later)

Ebola: Flu-like symptoms N/V/D, with fever, hemorrhage--> shock
NO CURE.  Give vaccine.

Pneumo plague: flu like symptoms + chest pain, bloody watery sputum, respiratory failure and shock
bubonic plague: swollen, painful lymph glands with fever, H/A, weakness. 
Tx: gentamicin.

Smallpox: fever, rash, vomiting, delirium, severe headache.  NO CURE.  Give vaccine.

Tularemia: sudden onset chills/aches, dry cough, diarrhea, join pain, progressive weakness.
Gentamicin.  MCI: give doxycycline and ciprofloxacin.  Give vaccine.

Chemical Terrorism

Undress the client, brush off the chemical.  Wash with lots of water--water is the universal antidote--except with dry chemicals such as lye or phosphorus--DO NOT APPLY WATER TO THESE AS THEY WILL CAUSE THE CHEMICAL TO BECOME A GAS/INCREASE BURN AREAS.

Radiation: contain all wash off and wastes.  Wear water resistant gowns, double glove, and fully cover body.  Cover all air vents and ducts, floors and furniture.  Decontaminate with soap and water and disposable towel.  

------------end detour---------

Once an injury or disease occurs:

assessment/data collection
: to get a whole picture before you make a decision, and judge whether or not there is survival potential (for example, if a 90 year-old begins to exhibit signs of malignant melanoma, is there a point in taking a biopsy? or, if there's an MCI and this woman has a severe head wound and blown pupils, is there a point to spending time on her?  Or do we go to the gaping chest wound?), and whether the patient is acute or chronic/urgent vs nonurgent/ stable vs unstable.  Remember that:

  • life trumps limb
airway>breathing>circulation>disability 

Disability really means something that will have a significant impact on quality life in the future, so, not the immediate life and death, but something that is involved in retaining "what makes life worth living."  For example, a child was in a massive motorbiking accident, and to save his life we had to apply a tourniquet, however, once we got him into surgery, we want to create a shunt to allow blood flow to continue to his lower limb in hopes that we can save the leg.
  • acute trumps chronic
  • actual trumps potential
  • trends trumps transient (findings)
  • emergencies trump expected (unless it violates life vs limb, in which case the expected would itself be an emergency)
  • clinical knowledge (aka common sense) trumps procedural standards
  • and then there's this listening trumps assuming (which basically means don't be a know-it-all asshole)
And then when you are treating, to treat in a way that is least restrictive and least invasive.

There's a lot of time saving tips, but the ones I found personally pertinent are:
1) completing the more difficult or strenuous tasks first.  Their reasoning was that if you attack the task while high on energy, you'll have a higher success rate (whereas my incorrect old reasoning was, that if I take care of all of the annoying, little tasks first I will be unburdened by distractions--but that's just not realistic in nursing, you will always have more distractions and tasks pop up, so yeah, tackle the beast task first).  
2) Avoiding interruptions and graciously but assertively saying "no" to unreasonable or poorly timed requests for help.  Sorry, not sorry.  
3) Setting realistic standards given the constraints of the assignment and the resources.  And do use socialization as a break tool
4) Complete one task before beginning another--and document immediately following the completion of a task (man, I really suck at this one).  
5) Use a sheet to organize/make lists.

And you have to stick with these tips no matter what your instincts are telling you to do (barring emergencies), because they will save your ass later down the line.



Assigning, Delegating, and Supervising

(Ughhhhh...  I just want to bang my head against a wall.  I never get these questions right, and part of the problem is the way we use these words colloquially.)

The nurse manager assigns the nurses certain clients to care for.  Assigning: transferring authority, accountability, and responsibility to another person for a task.  The nurse can then delegate certain tasks to UAPs.  Delegating: Transferring authority, and responsibility.  YOU STILL RETAIN ACCOUNTABILITY--in other words, you are still accountable for the quality of work and completion of the work.  In other words, if your UAP does a shit job, you're still in trouble, so you still need to check in on tasks you delegate.

If a nurse receives an inappropriate assignment she has to bring it to the attention of her superiors and then proceed up the chain of command if the situation isn't resolved.  You can't just abandon or refuse to accept the assignment--this is considered abandonment.  The order is:
  • scheduling/charge nurse
  • director of nursing
  • file a "Assignment Despite Objection" or "Document of Practice Situation"
Things an RN cannot delegate:
  • nursing process (assess, diagnose, plan, intervene, evaluate)
  • education
  • tasks requiring clinical judgment 

Things that an RN can delegate:
  • tasks with predictable outcomes (is it a routine, low risk treatment)
  • tasks that have a low potential for harm (the patient is stable, and it is unlikely to hurt him)
  • tasks that are not complex, and they are legally able to perform the task (so, as shocking as this may seem, insertion of a urinary catheter, trach care and suctioning, g-tube feedings, and checking NG tube patency ARE ALL CONSIDERED ROUTINE, so LPNs can do them; and as crazy as it seems since you could fuck up the procedure for specimen collection, UAPs can take specimen collection.  They can also take VS on stable clients--and yes, that includes stable post-op patients) 
  • task does not require problem solving or innovation (eg, no nursing assessment)
  • task does not require teaching
Right task, right circumstance, right person, right direction, right evaluation/supervise.


Informed Consent

Your job is to witness the signing on the consent form for an invasive procedure or surgery.  For most aspects of nursing care, implied consent (complying with the nurse's instructions) is adequate.  People who can sign consent are: parent of a minor, legal guardian, court appointed rep, spouse/POAHC, emancipated minor/married minor/pregnant minor.  --Document the reinforcement of information given by MD, the questions that were forwarded to MD/answered by MD, use of an interpreter.

Advanced Directives

2 parts of the advanced directive: 1) the living will, 2) POAHC.  You have to document the advance directives status and you have to update the file so that people will know if there's a DNR or AND.
FYI: Death=irreversible cessation of circulatory and resp. functions.  Irreversible cessation of all functions of the brain, including the brain stem.

Discharge Planning
(the reason why this is in Leadership and Management is because discharge planning for complex cases requires interprofessional coordination)

Normal discharge: 
-plan with both the client and family/caretaker in the room
  • give step by step instructions for for procedures to be done at home, with return demonstration
  • medication instruction including adverse effects and preventative actions
  • contact info for doctors and community services
  • follow-up plans and therapies
-additional services need to be coordinated and in place so that the continuity of care isn't broken


Against Medical Advice discharge (only if the patient is mentally competent):
1) immediately call the provider
2) explain the risks
3) have the patient sign the AMA form
4) document all communication including the advice provided for the client


Documentation of discharge:
type of discharge (ordered by provider or AMA), date & time, discharged with whom (accompanying the patient), how accompanied out of the hospital (w/c, stretcher, etc.) to destination (home, long-term care facility), summary of condition at discharge (VS, "patient is stable at this time"), description of any unresolved problems for follow-up, list of valuables and prescriptions that were taken upon discharge, copy of discharge instructions.

Patricia Brenner's 5 stages of nursing ability
  1. novice nurse (obeys the rules and guidelines--had minimum clinical experience)
  2. advanced beginner (can make clinical judgement based on sufficient clinicals)
  3. competent (practicing for 2-3 years)
  4. proficient nurse (significant experience, well-developed critical thinking, holistic conceptualization, able to react to unexpected changes)
  5. expert nurse (does not need rules to comprehend a situation and take action)

If there is a need for an educational program (eg, to update competency training):
1) identify the problem (can be taken retrospectively, concurrently, or prospectively):
  • structural audits: analyzing the setting (eg., the building), and the available human and material resource
  • process audits: review the relationship between the nurses (education, training, level of commitment) and the quality of care provided
  • outcome audits: results of the nursing care provided
  • root cause analysis: what variable contributed to an outcome, often done for sentinel (unexpected e.g. death, serious injury) events 
2) analyze what needs to be taught
3) research EBP regarding that subject
4) plan a teaching program
5) implement (teach)
6) evaluate


Performance Reviews
I have to remember that these books were written for people who may be in BSN, BA-MSN bridge programs because there's little chance of me becoming a supervisor and giving a performance appraisal or disciplinary action as an Assoc. RN., however, the day when I do become a supervisor (shudder), I guess I'll have to know this.  

Performance appraisals are used to give the nurse an opportunity to discuss personal goals and to receive feedback on their performance, not only deficiencies and discipline, but also praise.  There should be data and observed behavior documented/used as evidence, including anecdotes and peer view.  The appraisal should be done in private, by the unit manager, at a time convenient for the staff member's attendance.  And if the staff member does not agree with the evaluation, she should have the opportunity to make written comments on her evaluation and appeal the rating.

Disciplinary Action
  • deficiencies should be presented in writing, with evidence
  • correction should be based on policy
  • unless the offense is mistreatment of a client, or use of alcohol or drugs (p.s., I didn't know this before, but preferring to work the night shift when supervision is less on controlled substances are more frequently given is a sign of possible drug use), there should be progression in discipline: 
  1. first- informal meeting, discuss the issue and suggest correction
  2. second-manager meets with the employee and give a written warning to review exact violations of policies, and discuss the potential consequences 
  3. third-suspension without pay to give the employee time to examine the issue and consider alternatives
  4. fourth-terminate
Civil laws-protect the individual rights of people
torts=unintentional, quasi-intentional, or intentional

-Unintentional: Negligence & Malpractice (professional negligence): 
negligence must be proved by:
1) prove there was a standard of duty 
2) prove there was a breach of duty by failing to meet a standard
3) prove there was a possibility to foresee the harm that would be caused
4) prove there was there was a direct relationship between the breach of duty and the harm
5) harm actually occurred in direct causation of that breach of duty
-Quasi-intentional: breach of confidentiality and defamation of character
-Intentional torts: assault, battery, false imprisonment

Mandatory Reporting
  • Abuse of children
  • Abuse of elders and dependent adults
  • TB
  • foodborn outbreaks (Hep A)
  • diseases that have immunizations
Restraints
Prescription within 1 hour of seclusion or restraint, refreshed q24hr: specify reason for, type, location, how long it may be used, and type of behaviors that warranted application.  
neuro checks q2hr: circulation, sensation, mobility, with 2 finger give.
Other q2hr: food and fluids, toilet, VS, ROM
Document: behavior precipitating, and attempts to redirect/control leading up to restraint, leve of consciousness, type of restrain, etc., education of the client and family, exact time of application and removal and behavior while restrained, all the q2hr checks, response when the restraint was removed, and medication administration.


Ethics
Deontology--judging the morality of an action based on whether or not that action was in line with a society's rules (eg., duty, obligation, or rule based morality).
Utilitarianism--the morality of an action is based on whether the outcome benefits the most people or if the effect is overall good, e.g., "ends justify the means."

Negotiating Strategies
  1. avoiding
  2. smoothing
  3. coercion (just fyi, you can risk being terminated by refusing an assignment--depending on how asshole your boss is--but listen, if it's the difference between losing your job and losing your license, lose the job, you know?  And here's the thing: you need to refuse to practice beyond your legal scope or outside of your area of competence regardless of whatever reason your superior tells you.  They may say "there's not enough people," or "there's no one else to do it," but whatever, it's your license.)
  4. cooperating/accommodating
  5. compromising--even when there is compromise, if one side had to give up more than the other it can be a win-lose situation


 Grievances
But, like, if you're that fucking difficult to work with, you're probably going to get canned.  Or, if it's that unbearable to work where you're working, then you should just leave.  
  1. formal presentation of complaint with chain of command
  2. formal hearing
  3. professional mediation





Workout Break